Legal Opinion

People v. Peyton

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 2014No. B248767PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Lamenting the delays associated with the orderly processing of criminal cases, Justice Macklin Fleming explained a popular way for a criminal defendant to avoid, or at least delay, trial: “sidetracking.” He describes this as diverting “the inquiry into a collateral issue. ... In the operation of a railway system to sidetrack a train is to switch it from the main line to a siding. In criminal law to sidetrack a cause is to divert the accusation from the pending issue [(guilt or innocence)] to some other issue, any issue, and then keep the prosecution [or the trial court] so…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Allen CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. de Comarmond CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API