Legal Opinion

State v. . Beachum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1941PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The defendant’s principal assignment of error is predicated upon the refusal of the court below to charge the jury, as requested, that in no aspect of the testimony could the defendant be convicted of a higher offense than manslaughter. He contends that, while the verdict was manslaughter, the court’s submission of the question of second degree murder, under the circumstances, was prejudicial.

The evidence pertinent to the matters” involved in this appeal may be concisely stated as follows: The defendant and several companions were in an automobile being driven on a road leading to Godwin’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. S. v. . BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. State v. . FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Watson v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API