Legal Opinion

Spears v. Capital Region Medical Center, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2002No. WD 59842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This appeal involves a claim for medical malpractice based on res ipsa loquitur. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the respondent, Capital Region Medical Center. The appellant, Glen Spears, argues on appeal: 1) that Missouri should adopt the majority rule of allowing expert testimony in cases involving res ipsa loquitur, and 2) that prohibiting expert testimony vis-á-vis res ipsa lo-quitur violates the “open courts” provision of the Missouri Constitution.

Factual and Procedural History

On August 11, 1997, Spears went to Capital Region’s emergency…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Washington Ex Rel. Washington v. Barnes HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Hasemeier v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Callier v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meekins v. St. John's Regional Health Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Gaynor v. Washington UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Watts v. SechlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Meekins v. St. John's Regional Health Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Sides v. St. Anthony's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API