Legal Opinion

Watts v. Sechler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2004No. 25873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

Katrina Watts (“Plaintiff”) sued Raymond Sechler (“Defendant”) for damages, alleging that alfalfa hay she bought from Defendant poisoned her dairy cattle. Before trial, the court sustained Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs res ipsa loqui-tur count. The case went to trial on three other counts. At the close of Plaintiffs evidence, she opted to proceed on her “implied warranty of fitness for consumption” theory of recovery. Thereon, the trial court sustained Defendant’s motion for directed verdict. This appeal followed. 1

We affirm in part; we reverse and remand in…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Westerhold v. CarrollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Hasemeier v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickens v. Missouri Department of Health & Senior ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Giesing v. Schindler Elevator CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API