Legal Opinion

Seafood Exporters Ass'n of India v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 13, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-37; Court 05-00347PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STANCEU, Judge.

Plaintiffs Seafood Exporters Association of India (“SEAI”), Gourmet Fusion Foods Inc. (“GFF”), and International Creative Foods, Inc. (“ICF”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) challenge “Bond Directive 99-3510-004,” as amended (“Bond Directive”), which was issued by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”). The Bond Directive, which was issued by Customs headquarters, requires the various Customs port directors throughout the United States to review the sufficiency of the limits of liability in continuous entry bonds (“continuous bonds”) used…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. Presitex USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  3. Seafood Exps. Ass'n of India v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API