Legal Opinion
State v. Herbert
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 21, 1985No. 29153; CA A28263PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*108NEWMAN, J.
Defendant was indicted for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). The state appeals a pretrial order that granted defendant’s motion to suppress property seized from defendant just after his arrest. ORS 138.060(3). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Two officers of the St. Helens Police Department saw defendant in a store parking lot. Officer Yokum knew that there was an outstanding warrant for defendant’s arrest for failure to appear on a charge of driving while suspended. Yokum approached defendant and arrested him. Defendant told Yokum that he wanted to get some…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.