Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2001PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MIRARCHI, Jr., Senior Judge.

William O’Brien (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) modifying his disability benefits. The issue on appeal is whether the light-duty position offered by the City of Philadelphia (Employer) was “actually available” for the purpose of determining Employer’s entitlement to modify Claimant’s disability benefits, where payment of his pension benefits would be suspended during his “re-employment” with Employer in the offered position. We affirm.

The following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. St. Joe Container Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Lenzner Coach Lines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Meridian Professional Baseball Club v. JensenMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gallie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Colpetzer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Erb v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API