Legal Opinion

White Star Refining Co. v. Hansen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1930No. Docket No. 162, Calendar No. 34,948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The bill, on motion of defendant, was dismissed on the ground that plaintiff had adequate remedy at law, and it has appealed.

The bill alleges that plaintiff is in the business of manufacturing and distributing gasoline under widely advertised trade names, that its policy is to grant districts to owners of gasoline stations and to agree that it will not contract with others for sale of its products within such districts, that it entered into an agreement with defendant giving him a certain territory and the exclusive right to sell its products therein, and agreeing to supply his requirements…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White Marble Lime Co. v. Consolidated Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hardy v. Allegan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Peerless Pattern Co. v. Gauntlett Dry Goods Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Voigt Brewery Co. v. HoltzMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Brown v. RingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Melia v. Berghoff Brewing Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. National Concessions, Inc. v. National Circus CorporationsMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. WaldronMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API