Legal Opinion

White Marble Lime Co. v. Consolidated Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1919No. Docket No. 91PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Schoolcraft; Fead, J. Bill by the White Marble Lime Company against the Consolidated Lumber Company and the Thomas Berry Chemical Company for the specific performance of a contract. From a decree granting partial relief only, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The bill of complaint herein was filed to compel the defendant Consolidated Lumber Company to perform a contract for the sale and delivery to the plaintiff of certain slabs and edgings, and to enjoin the sale of said slabs and edgings to any other party than the plaintiff, or the conversion by the said defendant of said slabs and edgings to its own use. From a decree granting partial relief only, plaintiff has appealed. Neither of the defendants has appealed.

In a general way the salient facts are as follows:

*636On August 7, 1889, the Chicago Lumbering Company, a Michigan corporation, was engaged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ardis v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southwest Pipe Line Co. v. Empire Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. Michigan Sugar Co. v. FalkenhagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Coastal Transit Co. v. Springfield Bus Terminal, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Diamond Lumber Co. v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. O'Melia v. Berghoff Brewing Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API