Legal Opinion
Colorado Wild v. United States Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2006No. 05-1265PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellants Colorado Wild, Inc. and Heartwood, Inc. (collectively, the “Conservation Groups”) appeal from a final judgment in favor of Defendant-Appel-lee, United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) and Intervenor-Defendant-Ap-pellee Intermountain Forest Association (“Intermountain”). The Conservation Groups challenge, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-06, a categorical exclusion promulgated by the Forest Service (“Category 13”) that allows the salvage of dead and/or dying trees on up to 250 acres (with up to one-half mile…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Northwest Motorcycle Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Sierra Club v. BosworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hillsdale Environmental Loss Prevention, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Utah Environmental Congress v. BosworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Biodiversity Conservation Alliance v. JironCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.