Utah Environmental Congress v. Bosworth
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
In 2004, the United States Forest Service approved a 123-acre timber-thinning project to treat beetle-infested trees in Utah’s Fishlake National Forest. Its approval was made pursuant to a categorical exclusion, a streamlined process allowing minor projects to be quickly implemented so long as they have no significant effect on the environment. As a result of this decision, Utah Environmental Congress (“UEC”) appealed to the district court arguing that the project violated a number of environmental and regulatory provisions. We agree with the district court that the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Forest Guardians v. ForsgrenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Biodiversity Conservation Alliance v. JironCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.