Legal Opinion

Utah Environmental Congress v. Bosworth

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 6, 2006No. 05-4102PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

In 2004, the United States Forest Service approved a 123-acre timber-thinning project to treat beetle-infested trees in Utah’s Fishlake National Forest. Its approval was made pursuant to a categorical exclusion, a streamlined process allowing minor projects to be quickly implemented so long as they have no significant effect on the environment. As a result of this decision, Utah Environmental Congress (“UEC”) appealed to the district court arguing that the project violated a number of environmental and regulatory provisions. We agree with the district court that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Forest Guardians v. ForsgrenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Biodiversity Conservation Alliance v. JironCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API