Legal Opinion

Dailing v. Hall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2000No. 23431PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought a suit based on § 272.060 to recover from Defendants one half of what Plaintiffs spent budding a “division” fence between their adjacent properties.1 The trial court entered summary judgment for Defendants on the basis that the claim was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The parties in this case are neighboring landowners in Texas County. They share a common boundary line of approximately one mile in length which is marked by a fence. Plaintiffs constructed a new fence without the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. J.Z.G. Resources, Inc. v. Shelby Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Bi-State Development Agency v. Whelan Security Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. City of Chesterfield v. Deshetler Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Property Maintenance v. MoniaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API