Legal Opinion

In Re Doe

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 10, 2000No. 03-00-00231-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK KIDD, Justice.

This discovery mandamus relates to a personal injury lawsuit filed by the relator and plaintiff below, Jane Doe, 1 against the real parties in interest and defendants below, Wackenhut Corrections Corporation and some of its employees. The issues involved are whether the trial court abused its discretion by compelling Doe to submit to a mental examination, allowing the discovery of Doe’s mental health care providers and mental health records, and denying a protective order that would limit the scope of questions during Doe’s deposition. We will conditionally grant the writ.

Ba…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Nance, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. CIGNA Healthcare of Texas, Inc. v. Pybas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  3. In Re Transwestern Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. In Re Toyota Motor Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  5. Aubri Vahai v. Ryan GertschWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API