Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Sinclair

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit for broker’s commission. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

Appellee is, and for many years had been, in the hardware business in Chicago; he was induced by one Alexander to procure appellant to agree to sell certain property she owned, and to fix a price thereon. It seems to have been understood between appellee and Alexander that if appellee succeeded in his undertaking, he was not to be paid by Alexander, but that if Mrs. O’Neill concluded to sell and appellee brought to her Alexander as a purchaser, appellee, it was believed, would be able to obtain from her a commission for the sale thus made.

Appellee talked with Mrs. O’Neill at various times for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montross v. EddyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ranney v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. City of East St. Louis v. BuxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Missouri Lumber & Mining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  2. Hickey & Spieker Co. v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API