Legal Opinion
H. C. Klopfenstein v. W. P. Pargeter, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1979No. 77-3342, 78-2976PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Klopfenstein appeals from an adverse summary judgment in this diversity action which arose out of an aborted joint venture agreement. The district court ruled that the joint venture had been mutually rescinded or abandoned. 1 Appellant contends he raised a material issue of fact regarding his intent to terminate the joint venture. In the consolidated appeal, Klopfenstein contends attorney’s fees were improperly awarded. 2 We disagree with both contentions and affirm the district court.
Klopfenstein and defendant-appellee Pargeter orally contracted to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Interform Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Schulz v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Theodore Granik v. John H. Perry Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Johnson v. KoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by29 opinions
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Over the Road Drivers, Inc. v. Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- In Re Larry's ApartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Solomon Angel v. Seattle-First National Bank, and Third Party v. United States of America, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Jacobson v. HannifinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.