Anniston Loan & Trust Co. v. Stickney
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Anniston City Court. Tried before Hon. James W. Lapsley. The facts upon which the opinion in this case is based; are sufficiently shown therein. The place of payment of the note is sufficiently certain.- — Rudolph v. Brewer, 96 Ala. 189 ; Bait r. Carr, 54 Ala. 112 ; Potter v. Sheets, 32 N. E. Rep., 811 ; Brown v. First Nat. Bank, 15 So. Rep., 435. The agreement for extension of the note did not affect its negotiability. — -Tiedeman Com. Pa., § 25; Nrlson r.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Anniston City Court. Tried before Hon. James W. Lapsley. The facts upon which the opinion in this case is based; are sufficiently shown therein. The place of payment of the note is sufficiently certain.- — Rudolph v. Brewer, 96 Ala. 189 ; Bait r. Carr, 54 Ala. 112 ; Potter v. Sheets, 32 N. E. Rep., 811 ; Brown v. First Nat. Bank, 15 So. Rep., 435. The agreement for extension of the note did not affect its negotiability. — -Tiedeman Com. Pa., § 25; Nrlson r. Manning, 53 Ala. 549; Gaines v. Domett, 18-La. Ann., 563 ; Knight v. Reynolds, 37 Tex. 204; Atche-sonv. Scott, 51 Tex. 213;…
1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.
The suit was founded on the defendants indorsement of a promissory note, which is in these words and figures :
“$1100.00 Anniston, Ala., February 11th, 1893. S-ix months after date, I promise to pay to the order of Benj. Micou, eleven hundred dollars. Value received. Negotiable and payable at Anniston Loan and Trust Company, of Anniston, Ala.
And in case this note is nót paid at maturity and suit is brought for its collection, we agree to pay ten per cent, attorney’s fees; and each of us, whether maker or endorser, hereby waive and renounce for myself and faniily any and a-11 homestead or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keel v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Second National Bank v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- First National Bank v. CarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Rudulph v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Lee v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- State Bank v. BilstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Culbreath v. Guiterman, Rosenfield & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Coffey v. Day & Night Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1926
- Bank of Oglethorpe v. SwindleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.