Napier v. Hartford Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FORESTER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Donna Napier’s (“Napier”) motion for judgment overturning administrative decision, and upon Defendant Hartford Life Insurance Company’s (“Hartford”) cross motion for judgment on the merits. These matters are ripe for review.
I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Napier claims entitlement to long term disability benefits under an employee welfare benefit plan governed exclusively by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Napier was an employee of Kentucky Central Life…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Mary Moore Hoover v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cornish v. United States Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009
- Geiger v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Perrin v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2007
- Pikulas v. DaimlerChryslerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Meiman v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019