Legal Opinion
Pikulas v. DaimlerChrysler
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 31, 2005No. 05-70846PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DUGGAN, District Judge.
Christine Pikulas filed suit against Da-imlerChrysler to recover long-term disability benefits under section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) (“ERISA!’), after DaimlerChrysler issued a final denial of Plaintiffs claim for benefits. Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion .for Judgment on the Administrative Record Reversing Defendant’s Denial of Benefits and Defendant’s Motion to Affirm Administrator’s Decision, both filed on August 1, 2005. This Court held a hearing on. the motions on October 20,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Terry Smith v. Ameritech Ameritech Publishing, Inc. Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Williams v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jani v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006