Legal Opinion

Meiman v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided November 5, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00075Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT COVINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-75 (WOB-CJS) LISA MEIMAN PLAINTIFF VS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AETNA LIFE INS. CO. DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Lisa Meiman, filed suit against Defendant, Aetna Life Insurance, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act,

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq., after Aetna terminated the long-term disability benefits it had been paying her for over ten years. Meiman seeks to recover the denied benefits, plus prejudgment interest, and asks the Court to clarify her rights to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Richard Kalish v. Liberty Mutual/liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API