Legal Opinion
Stuart Day v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2016No. 15-1711PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Appellees are a class of former employees (“the employees”) of non-party Continental Express, Inc. (“Continental”). The employees brought a class action lawsuit against Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. (“Celadon”), alleging that Celadon violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. The district court 1 certified the class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), granted partial summary judgment in favor of the employees as to WARN Act liability, and awarded the employees damages due under the WARN Act. Celadon appeals the judgment of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Michael Vogt v. State Farm Life Insurance CompCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Jin v. Shanghai Original, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Rudy Webb v. Exxon Mobil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Varela v. AE Liquidation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Int'l Bhd. of Boilermakers v. Nassco Holdings Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.