Legal Opinion

Beattie Through Beattie v. United States

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 13, 1986No. A85-209 Civil, A85-359 Civil and A85-387 CivilPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

(Motion for Summary Judgment by United States of America Granted)

HOLLAND, District Judge.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In 1969 after Alaska received $900 million for Prudhoe Bay oil leases, Governor Keith Miller proposed an “Alaska Permanent Resources Fund” to be invested and its earnings used to fund future state budgets. The plan did not receive legislative support. Instead these funds and some $400 million in interest were used by the state in its operation and capital budgets. The “disappearance” of this fund caused a public outcry which resulted in the creation of a state savings account. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. David J. Greisen, by and Through His Father and Natural Guardian, Ronald E. Greisen v. United States of America, Mary Elizabeth Beattie and Catherine Anne Beattie, Minors, Through Their Next Friend, J. Patrick Beattie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Greisen ex rel. Greisen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. K Lazy K Ranch, Inc. v. Farm Credit Bank of OmahaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API