Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Hanson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 3, 2007No. 58577-1-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — Paul and Jeannine Hanson appeal the trial court’s determination that they are personally liable for the judgment Heather and Chad Thompson obtained against the Hansons’ construction company, Paul V. Hanson, Inc. (PVH). Before the Thompsons filed their breach of contract lawsuit against PVH, PVH transferred property it owned to the Hansons. After obtaining a judgment against PVH for breach of the purchase and sale agreement, the Thompsons sued the Hansons under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), chapter 19.40 RCW, for the value of the property that was transferred. Following…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rountree v. Nunnery (In Re Rountree)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Thompson v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Jesse Curtis v. Richard James and Sharon James, Defendants/Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaft Bank v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.