Legal Opinion

Jesse Curtis v. Richard James and Sharon James, Defendants/Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 2015No. ED101485PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, J.

Introduction

Jesse Curtis (Appellant) appeals from the circuit court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Richard James and Sharon James (collectively Respondents) on Appellant’s petition seeking relief under the Missouri Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Sections 428.005 to 428.059 (the Act). 1 We reverse and remand.

Factual and Procedural Background

In a lawsuit pending in the circuit court of Camden County, Appellant alleged he sustained personal injuries on June 1, 2012, while riding as a passenger on a motorized all-terrain vehicle while on Respondents’ real property (underlying lawsuit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Nelson v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Advanced Telecommunication Network, Inc. v. Allen (In Re Advanced Telecommunication Network, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Lueker v. Missouri Western State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Baker v. GeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Enterprise Financial Group Inc v. Richard PodhornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Hurricane Deck Holding Co. v. Spanburg Invs., LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Petruska v. City of KinlochMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Ackman v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Emily Riegel v. David G. JungermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API