Tenreed Corp. v. Philadelphia Folding Box Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, President Judge:
This is an appeal by Philadelphia Folding Box Company from an order of the lower court denying its petition to open a confessed judgment. For the reasons developed below, we conclude that the lower court should have granted the petition to open and, therefore, reverse.
The essential facts of the case were set forth in a prior decision by this Court; 1 only a brief resume of those facts is necessary for purposes of this appeal. It will be remembered that the original lease, effective December 1, 1963, contained a provision for the continuation of that lease on the same…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wenger v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Greenwood v. KadoichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Christie v. Open Pantry Food Marts, Inc. of Delaware ValleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Wolgin v. MickmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Ritchey v. MARS Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bell Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Laura Lanes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Duffy v. GerstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Equibank, N.A. v. DobkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Van Arkel & Moss Properties, Inc. v. Kendor, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Pawco, Inc. v. Bergman Knitting Mills, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.