Legal Opinion
Wolgin v. Mickman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 1975No. Appeals, Nos. 1298, 1299, and 1300PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant contends that the court below erred in refusing to open the judgments confessed against appellant on three judgment notes, allegedly signed by appellant’s husband without her authority.
In the early part of 1972, appellant’s husband, Mark Mickman, signed both his name and that of appellant, Sylvia Mickman, to three judgment notes.1 The appellees lent Mark Mickman $33,500, apparently for use in one or another of Mr. Mickman’s businesses. The notes were given to secure those loans. On March 9, 1972, appellee Wolgin confessed judgment for $18,500 on the note dated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wenger v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Greenwood v. KadoichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Christie v. Open Pantry Food Marts, Inc. of Delaware ValleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Triangle Building Supplies & Lumber Co. v. ZermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Mellon Bank v. RafskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Foerst v. RotkisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.