Bell Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Laura Lanes, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants contend that the lower court abused its discretion in denying their petition to open a judgment confessed upon a mortgage note. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the court below.
On January 4, 1966, appellants borrowed $570,000 from appellee’s predecessor in interest to finance a bowling alley and restaurant and signed a mortgage note containing standard acceleration and confession of judgment clauses. Four years later, on October 2, 1970, appellants went into a prolonged receivership. During the receivership appellee unsuccessfully attempted to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Instapak Corp. v. S. Weisbrod Lamp & Shade Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Ministers & Missionaries Benefit Board of the American Baptist Churches v. GoldsworthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kardos v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- First Pennsylvania Bank N.A. v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Fidelity Bank v. Act of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- First Seneca Bank & Trust Co. v. Laurel Mountain Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lazzarotti v. JulianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pittsburgh National Bank v. LarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Weitzman v. UlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.