Legal Opinion

Bell Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Laura Lanes, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1981No. 1164PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend that the lower court abused its discretion in denying their petition to open a judgment confessed upon a mortgage note. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the court below.

On January 4, 1966, appellants borrowed $570,000 from appellee’s predecessor in interest to finance a bowling alley and restaurant and signed a mortgage note containing standard acceleration and confession of judgment clauses. Four years later, on October 2, 1970, appellants went into a prolonged receivership. During the receivership appellee unsuccessfully attempted to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Instapak Corp. v. S. Weisbrod Lamp & Shade Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Ministers & Missionaries Benefit Board of the American Baptist Churches v. GoldsworthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Kardos v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. First Pennsylvania Bank N.A. v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Fidelity Bank v. Act of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. First Seneca Bank & Trust Co. v. Laurel Mountain Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Lazzarotti v. JulianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Pittsburgh National Bank v. LarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Weitzman v. UlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API