Legal Opinion

Badgley v. Van Upp

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1993No. A057651PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENSON, J.

—Defendant Arden Van Upp (Van Upp) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff Laurence E. Badgley (Badgley). Van Upp raises several contentions on appeal, including the following: (1) the trial court should have sustained her demurrers to Badgley’s complaints on the grounds the subject matter of the complaints was subject to contractual arbitration and (2) the trial court’s reference of this case to a court commissioner to take all of the evidence was improper. We agree with the second contention and, accordingly, reverse the judgment and remand this case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Charles J. Rounds Co. v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Williams v. Benton.California Supreme Court · 1864

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Murphy v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. De Guere v. Universal City Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Kalai v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Sonoma County Human Services Department v. Dianne C.California Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API