Masino v. Outboard Marine Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
McGLYNN, District Judge.
The question presently before the court is whether, in a civil action where the jurisdiction of the United States District Court is based upon diversity of citizenship between the parties, the court is required to apply a state law prescribing that a five-sixths majority of jurors shall constitute the verdict *252of the jury instead of the federal rule requiring that jury verdicts be unanimous.
I. FACTS
On August 19, 1977, plaintiff, Sheila Masino, was operating her Lawn-Boy lawnmower when she reached into the chute which discharges the cut grass and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Betty Bledsoe and Gail Wesson v. Daniel v. Garcia, Bill Sieferd, and Bill PepplerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Montgomery County v. MicroVote Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. State of Delaware Department of Health & Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005