Legal Opinion

Masino v. Outboard Marine Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 79-2465PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

McGLYNN, District Judge.

The question presently before the court is whether, in a civil action where the jurisdiction of the United States District Court is based upon diversity of citizenship between the parties, the court is required to apply a state law prescribing that a five-sixths majority of jurors shall constitute the verdict *252of the jury instead of the federal rule requiring that jury verdicts be unanimous.

I. FACTS

On August 19, 1977, plaintiff, Sheila Masino, was operating her Lawn-Boy lawnmower when she reached into the chute which discharges the cut grass and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Betty Bledsoe and Gail Wesson v. Daniel v. Garcia, Bill Sieferd, and Bill PepplerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Montgomery County v. MicroVote Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. State of Delaware Department of Health & Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  4. Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API