Legal Opinion
Betty Bledsoe and Gail Wesson v. Daniel v. Garcia, Bill Sieferd, and Bill Peppler
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1984No. 81-1778, 81-2336PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of these appeals. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The causes are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
In No. 81-1778 plaintiffs Betty Bledsoe and Gail Wesson appeal from an adverse judgment in their civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Their main contentions are that the trial court committed reversible error in giving the jury instructions and in refusing plaintiffs’ tendered instructions. In…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Randy Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa, Oklahoma Mayor Curtis Conley and Police Chief Benny DirckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Chauncey L. Moore, Jr. v. The Marketplace Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Gutierrez v. Luna CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Starrett v. WadleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Dixon v. City of LawtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.