Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bertram

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1940No. Appeal, 257PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The indictment charged that defendant “being the putative father of Frances Patricia Bertram and Virginia Diane Bertram, children begotten and born out of lawful wedlock in the City of Washington and District of Columbia, the said children having been born February 9, 1939, and being now residents of the said City of Washington and District of Columbia, did unlawfully, wilfully and maliciously neglect and refuse to contribute reasonably to the support of the said Frances Patricia Bertram and Virginia Diane Bertram, contrary to the form of the Act of the General Assembly 1…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DornesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Commonwealth v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Reynolds v. FlynnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. WibnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. DunnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bessie N. Rankin. Robert L. Rankin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Commonwealth v. PewattsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. ShookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API