Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1913No. Appeal, No. 112PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal, No. 112, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court, April T., 1913, No. 78, affirming order of C. C. Allegheny Co., Com. Docket 1912, No. 303, in case of Commonwealth y. ■ Andrew Hopkins. Appeal from Superior Court (See 53 Pa. Superior Court 16) affirming order of the County Court of Allegheny County in desertion proceedings.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 112, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court, April T., 1913, No. 78, affirming order of C. C. Allegheny Co., Com. Docket 1912, No. 303, in case of Commonwealth y. ■ Andrew Hopkins. Appeal from Superior Court (See 53 Pa. Superior Court 16) affirming order of the County Court of Allegheny County in desertion proceedings. Head, J., filed the following opinion: Following a hearing in the County Court of Allegheny County, the defendant appellant was ordered by that court to pay the sum of $40.00 per month “for the support of his four minor children, &c.” From that…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

A majority of the court are of opinion that the order of the Superior Court appealed from should he affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Head.

Order affirmed.

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brereton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. MexalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Gerlach v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Scott v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API