Legal Opinion
Fortune v. City of Syracuse
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1948Published
1Opinion of the CourtSearl, J.
The present controversy is between City of Syracuse, third party plaintiff and Warren Brothers Company, third party defendant. Attorneys for the plaintiff take no part. The motion seeks an order dismissing the second cause df action in a third party complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and for a dismissal of the alleged third party cause of action under the provisions of section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act. The plaintiff’s complaint *739seeks damages against third party plaintiff, the City of Syracuse, on the ground of negligence,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Walters v. Rao Electrical Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Sorrentino v. SorrentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.