Graham v. Gielchinsky
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
This appeal concerns an apparent gap in our Rules of Civil Procedure dealing with the discovery and use of the opinion evidence of an expert consulted by an adversary. Absent exceptional circumstances, our Rules of Civil Procedure do not permit discovery of the names or opinions of experts that a party has consulted but does not intend to call at trial. See R. 4:10-2(d)(3). At the same time, however, the Rules do not address whether a litigant may use that information at trial when obtained through means other than discovery.
The contested…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Kaufman v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Granger v. WisnerArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Ramacorti v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- General Motors Corp. v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Fitzgerald v. Stanley Roberts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Cordy v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Stigliano v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.