Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Meek v. Hays
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 19, 1990No. 63,145PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
Jasper R. Hays constructed a fence across Shoal Creek, in part to prevent canoeists and others from using that portion of the stream which flows through his land located in southeast Cherokee County. Christopher Y. Meek, the Cherokee County Attorney, filed a petition for declaratory judgment seeking to confirm the public’s right to use Shoal Creek for recreational purposes. On June 11, 1988, the district court ordered Hays to remove the fence pending a hearing on the State’s petition. On September 22, the district court denied the State’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Reitsma v. Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Parks v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Ace Equipment Sales, Inc. v. BuccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.