Legal Opinion
Priem v. Priem
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 13, 2013No. A130791PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DONDERO, J.
In this dissolution proceeding, appellant Veronica Priem appeals from the trial court’s orders denying her request for temporary spousal support and denying a portion of her request for professional fees. The court found she was statutorily ineligible to receive spousal support based on her history of domestic violence towards her husband, respondent Curtis Priem. She claims the court erroneously considered her prior plea of nolo contendere to a misdemeanor charge of domestic violence in arriving at its decision. She also claims the court failed to properly consider her fee…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. YartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Cartwright v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Kennick v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Gebremicael v. California Commision on Teacher CredentialingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Husman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Donorovich-Odonnell v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Orange Co. Water Dist. v. AlcoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Orange County Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global FastenersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.