Legal Opinion

Gould v. Otto

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1927No. Docket No. 5639PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $640 claimed to be due for services rendered in connection with the sale of defendants’ real property, and was given judgment for the sum of $300. The defendants appeal.

The amended complaint contained six counts. The first declared upon an agreement authorizing respondent to sell said real property at a stated price, for commission of $640; the others were common counts, the third being a quantum meruit for services rendered at appellants’ request. Answering, appellants denied the allegations of the respective counts, and alleged as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. McPhail v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McCarthy v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kraemer v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Albertson v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API