Gould v. Otto
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $640 claimed to be due for services rendered in connection with the sale of defendants’ real property, and was given judgment for the sum of $300. The defendants appeal.
The amended complaint contained six counts. The first declared upon an agreement authorizing respondent to sell said real property at a stated price, for commission of $640; the others were common counts, the third being a quantum meruit for services rendered at appellants’ request. Answering, appellants denied the allegations of the respective counts, and alleged as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- McPhail v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McCarthy v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kraemer v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Albertson v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943