Legal Opinion

United States v. Calman Bernstein

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1975No. 74--1066PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals from a district court order that suppressed Caiman Bernstein’s intercepted phone calls as evidence against him. The court found that when the government applied for the intercept order extensions, under which the conversations were later seized, its agents knew that Bernstein was committing the crime under investigation and would use the telephone they sought to tap. Because Bernstein was not identified in either the applications or the extensions, in violation of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, the court suppressed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. VentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. ClerkleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Ralph PrincipieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Max Abramson, United States of America v. Frank Bonfiglio, United States of America v. Paul Cappellano, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API