Legal Opinion
Garland Co. v. Filmer
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 16, 1932No. 3109, 3174PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
Suits have been brought by two taxpayers in the Golden Gate bridge and highway district, which will be hereafter referred to as the district, to enjoin the issuance of bonds by the directors of the district and to remove the cloud upon the title to plaintiffs’ property arising from the threatened exercise of the power of taxation to meet the principal and interest of the bonds by the district. The plaintiff in the Garland Company ease is- a taxpayer of the city and county of San Francisco, and the plaintiff in the Del Norte Company case is a taxpayer in Del Norte…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Howard v. LadnerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1953
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HarlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Le Blanc v. Southern Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Dawn Elaine Brown, by and Through Gayle (Brown) Marden, as Her Mother and Next Friend, Cross v. Dixie Herlong Chastain, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.