Legal Opinion
Schinkel v. Maxi-Holding, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided January 30, 1991No. 88-P-1294PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Maxi-Holding, Inc. (Maxi), the amended complaint alleges, 2 is a holding company organized in Massachusetts to hold shares of Eastern Lumber, Inc., and other corporations that are engaged in lumber and hardware businesses. The capital stock of Maxi is owned by Rake Oy, a Finnish corporation, which is controlled by the defendant Cederberg, who lives in Finland. Cederberg either is or acts as the chief executive officer of Maxi. The plaintiff, a Massachusetts resident, had done work as a consultant for Rake Oy and Maxi from the 1970’s and in 1985 was asked by Cederberg to devote the majority of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Kurker v. HellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Nota Construction Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Celia G. Zimmerman v. Direct Federal Credit Union and David BreslinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Cambridgeport Savings Bank v. BoersnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Walter F. Biggins v. The Hazen Paper Company, Walter F. Biggins v. The Hazen Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.