Legal Opinion
Ekstrand v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 4, 1990No. H-89-1275PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*93ORDER
On December 12, 1989, the petitioner, Hugo Darwin Ekstrand, filed an application for this Court to assume jurisdiction and issue a writ of habeas corpus in Tulsa County District Court Case No. CRF-87-728. Petitioner has alleged that 57 O.S. Supp.1988, § 138 is an ex post facto law as applied to him in that it computes earned time credits in such a way as to allow him fewer credits than he was given under the previous statute, thereby lengthening his sentence. On December 20, 1989, this Court directed a response from the Respondents. On January 29, 1990, the Respondents filed their…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Jeffrey Raske v. Bob Martinez, Governor, State of Florida, and Richard Dugger, Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Canady v. ReynoldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Claudie Wallace v. R. Michael Cody Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Waldon v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Nestell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Raymond Leon Arnold v. R. Michael Cody the Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.