Legal Opinion
Canady v. Reynolds
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 24, 1994No. O-94-308, O-94-309PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANSWERING CERTIFIED QUESTION OF LAW
LUMPKIN, Presiding Judge:
Frank H. Seay, District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, has certified a Question of Law pursuant to the Oklahoma Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.1991, §§ 1601-1611, as follows:
“Is there a state mandamus remedy whereby inmates may challenge the administration of their sentences and allege the unconstitutional denial of earned credits they are entitled to receive; and if not, what is the proper state remedy for inmates to challenge the administration of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Wilson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Moore v. GibsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Gamble v. CalboneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- DEO v. PARISHCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.