Legal Opinion
Raymond Leon Arnold v. R. Michael Cody the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1991No. 91-7061PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner appeals from an Order of the district court denying his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On appeal, he argues that the 1989 amendments to the Oklahoma Prison Overcrowding Emergency Powers Act, 1 Okla.Stat. tit. 57, §§ 570-576, as applied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Andrew James Devine v. New Mexico Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Ekstrand v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- Claudie Wallace v. R. Michael Cody Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Siers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Tracy v. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Alfred Brooks v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, Farrell HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.