Legal Opinion
Mansfield Beauty Academy, Inc. v. Board of Registration of Hairdressers
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 3, 1951PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
■ The plaintiff is engaged in the business of conducting a school in Boston for the purpose of teaching students hairdressing and manicuring, and is registered under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 112, § 87BB, as amended. This bill in equity seeks a binding declaration as to the constitutionality of St. 1949, c. 345 (which amends c. 112, § 87U, as appearing in St. 1941, c. 626, § 3), entitled, “An Act prohibiting hairdressing schools charging for services or materials used in connection with hairdressing or manicuring.” The statutory provision is: “No student shall practice hairdressing or manicuring…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Corning Glass Works v. Ann & Hope, Inc. of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.