Ohio Edison Co. v. Power Siting Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Bitown, J.
Two issues are raised by the instant cause. The first is whether, under R. C. 4906.10(A) (3),'the commission may deny a Certificate of Envirom mental Compatibility and Public Need solely on the grounds that the utility’s expansion plans will have a greater than minimum adverse impact on recreational facilities. The second is whether, in the instant cause, the commission’s order, promulgated pursuant to Rule 4906-15-05(F)(2), Ohio Adm. Code, impairs the obligation of contracts and deprives appellant of propérty without due process of law.
I
In its first proposition of law, appellant argues that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- DeMoise v. DowellOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- City of Portsmouth v. McGrawOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Fish v. CoffeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.