Legal Opinion

Fourth National Bank v. Memorial Park

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1937No. 26676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLESS, Y. O. J.

At the date this action was commenced in the court below, the Fourth National Bank of Tulsa, defendant to the action, held a certain instrument of writing which had theretofore been recorded in the office of the county clerk of Tulsa county. Said instrument was entitled, “Deed to Lot in Memorial Park,” and on its face purported to be a deed to said bank by “Memorial Park, a Trust Estate,” for real estate therein described as “lots 1 to 120 incl., in. section 16, of Memorial Park, a subdivision for cemetery purposes.” Said instrument appeared as having been executed under date…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Williams v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Shull v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Haynes v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Billingslea v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Crane Co. v. GoerkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Davis v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Oklahoma City Federal Savings & L. Ass'n v. SwatekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Billingslea v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API