Legal Opinion

Dykeman v. Engelbrecht

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 16, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 89-097, 1 CA-CV 89-128PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant/Plaintiff Heidi Leigh Dyke-man appeals from a jury verdict finding her 60 percent at fault and apportioning damages accordingly. She raises the following issues on appeal: 1

1. Did the trial court err by refusing to instruct the jury on the last clear chance doctrine?

2. Did the trial court err by refusing to instruct the jury regarding defendant’s speed and A.R.S. § 28-701A?

3. Did the trial court improperly comment on the evidence when it told the jury that criminal charges against defendant had been dismissed?

4. Was defense counsel’s reference to the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wareing v. FalkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Laws v. WebbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Cox v. May Department Store Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Spahn v. Town of Port RoyalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API