United States Ex Rel. Centanni v. Washington
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Each of Raymond and Paul Centanni (individually “Raymond” and “Paul,” and collectively “Petitioners”) has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”) petition, later supplanted by an amended petition (for convenience each amended petition will be referred to as “Petition”), seeking the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. 1 Both Petitioners challenge the April 28, 1986 Judgment of Conviction and Sentence entered by the Circuit Court of Lake County, which imposed a 30-year term of imprisonment on each of them after he had pleaded guilty…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jackson v. ParishDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Todd v. LeibachDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004