Rosillo v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
Defendant Alfredo Rosillo was found guilty of burglary by a district court jury and was sentenced to a maximum term of 5 years in prison. On appeal from the order of the district court denying his petition for postconviction relief, defendant contends that (1) the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient, (2) the trial court erred in refusing to suppress certain evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds, and (3) the trial court’s jury instructions were inadequate. We affirm.
The burglary of which defendant was convicted involved a pool hall in downtown Fairmont. A tenant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Calvin D. RahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- State v. SwainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. IhleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. SnedekerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. GailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. YaritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.