Legal Opinion

Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1988No. C6-87-365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the court of appeals holding that underinsured motorist coverage, imposed by operation of law due to the insurer’s failure to make a mandatory offer of such coverage pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 6(e) (1978) (repealed 1980), was available in an amount equal to the insured’s residual liability limits where such limits were greater than the minimum liability coverage required by statute. We affirm.

I

On March 16, 1979, Kenneth Osterdyke was severely injured when the vehicle he was driving collided with another vehicle. The other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Jablonski v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Frank v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Pinney v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Westendorf v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API