Legal Opinion

Westendorf v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1989No. CO-88-1120Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (Penn General) appeals the trial court’s judgment, entered pursuant to a directed verdict, reforming respondents’ automobile insurance policy to include underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage totalling $500,000 per person and $1,000,000 per occurrence, after stacking.

FACTS

In early 1978, respondent David Westen-dorf telephoned an insurance agent and long-time friend of the Westendorfs, to ask him if he could sell the Westendorfs auto insurance. The agent gave his notes of this telephone conversation to an underwriter in his office…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Kuchenmeister v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API